While describing the proportions of the ideal man, Vitruvius mentions that this canon was used by 'the ancients' especially while composing the sacred buildings. The question is whom Vitruvius had in mind, while referring to the ancients...
4. Therefore if Nature has planned the human body so that the members correspond in their proportions to its complete configuration, the ancients seem to have had reason in determining that in the execution of their works they should observe an exact adjustment of the several members to the general pattern of the plan. Therefore, since in all their works they handed down orders, they did so especially in building temples, the excellences and the faults of which usually endure for ages. - Book 3, c. I1
A collection Sketches and Trial Pieces in British Museum, contains a strange piece under the catalogue number EGYPT-5601. The official description is:
Wooden board overlaid with gesso which was used by an artist either for teaching purposes or for making a preliminary drawing which would subsequently be reproduced on a larger scale as a carved relief on the wall of a temple. Both in order to facilitate enlargement and to ensure that be observed canonical proportions, the artist has drawn the seated figure of a king over a grid composed of a red vertical and horizontal lines. When reproducing the figure on a larger scale a similar grid, but of larger dimensions, would be drawn on the wall and a correspondingly larger figure drawn over it, the various members being placed in the same relative position as in the original sketch. The hieroglyphic group repeated twice in the cartouches opposite the face, contains a combination of king Tuthmosis III (c. 1450 B.C.) and ether Senusret I (c. 2000 B.C.), or Pinejem I (c. 1050 B.C.) which suggests that the artist had no particular king in mind when drawing a sketch. The chick and the human arms represent hieroglyphic signs presumably drawn for practice.
![]() | ||
![]() | British Museum: Wooden board overlaid with gesso, EGYPT-5601, Sketches and Trial pieces. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Like in da Vinci's drawing, the center of the standing figure is not the navel as Vitruvius prescribes, but the joint of the legs and the body, in da Vinci's case the place of phallos, while in this proto-Vitruvian Man, the posterior.
Like in da Vinci's drawing a square plays an important role, but in a slightly different manner. If the circle is 20 modules in diameter, the inscribed square would have a side: 20 / sqr(2) = 14.14 or 14 modules. Relation between the circle and the square 10 : 7 is a rational approximation of the square root of 2 from the second of Pell Series:
The difference between the circle and the inscribed square is 3 modules on both sides, or the height from shoulders to the top of the head, which fits in the height of the seating figure 5 times.
Bibliography:
Vitruvius, De Architectura, F. Granger's translation, Loeb Classical Library, 1970
_____________________
SOURCE: www.aiwaz.net
http://www.aiwaz.net/Origins-of-VITRUVIAN-MAN/a7
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire